I went to sleep at about 5:30 this morning. Birds were also awake at that time. It was aggravating. The main problem lay in the fact that I was exhausted by 2, dead-on-my-ass by 3:30, and just really, really not wanting to have my eyes open for all the time after. I have a dentist appointment in an hour, so sleeping the way certain tiny blonde people do regularly is not an option either. Great.
We suffered through S. Darko last night, and let me take a moment to profess the obvious: It was quite possibly the most heinous thing ever to touch a screen. Now, let me be clear about this. I knew the movie would suck way before we put it in the DVD player. I didn't suspect this fact--I knew it. There was no question there. The question lay in whether or not a sane human being (specifically one who rates Donnie Darko as one of the top five movies of all time) could sit through the obvious travesty of a film without wanting to take every individual who greenlit, wrote, directed, produced, "acted" in, and generally was involved in some way with the movie, placing them all atop a windmill-like contraption, and aiming a flaming meteor of alien metal their way.
Within the first few moments, it became painfully clear that this was not going to be the case. I had been all set for shock, disappointment, and horror, and had even left myself a tiny nugget of optimistic space in case this movie actually did wind up being somehow stunning. I was still completely and utterly amazed at the atrocious quality of just about everything happening on Rob's television screen.
For all those looking to get involved with the film, novel, television, or entertainment industry as a whole, here's a back-to-basics, 101-esque tip for you. You want to give to your audience. You want to lead them to a place that is engaging, possibly thought-provoking, hopefully life-changing. At the very least, you want them to think their time was well-enough spent to not scream for their four-dollars in movie rental back. The makers of S. Darko, apparently, never learned this life lesson, because the film completely ignores the golden truth of "give." Contrarily, it asks so very much of the people on the other side of the screen that the mind boggles--and the only thing it offers in return is the intense desire to find a wormhole and get back the lost 103 minutes of your life.
The whole time the film was on, I tried to find a reason not to burn it. The acting certainly couldn't fit the bill; S. Darko boasts such "stars" as half of the One Tree Hill duo (probably because he looks the most like Jake Gyllenhaal), a girl from Step Up 2 (which I'm assuming is about as eye-bleedingly-bad as Step Up), and one of the Sparkle Motion vampires in Twilight. Even Daveigh Chase, who pretended to have some talent as the ten-year-old climbing out of wells and lending her voice to Hawaiian Disney characters, could not have put on a worse performance (though she did channel her Ring-self a bit, which was...um, repetitive). I'm inclined to split the blame neatly down the middle, placing half on the actors and half on the dreadful script. Nothing was okay about that script. Honestly. Who greenlit that script? Not only was the dialogue beyond cheesy (factoring in half-assed attempts to throw-back to DD and such gem banter clips as the banal delivery of, "We're still perfect." "Immaculate"--about twelve times), but the plot made no sense. And not even in the way DD made no sense. They did not even try to make sense. I think they really just sat down at a table with their LSD (which might explain the out-of-nowhere tirade the guy from Gossip Girl, who was so unmemorable that we forgot his name halfway through the movie, goes on about acid trips) and just chose elements of potential interest. These elements didn't have to lock together in any way, mind you. They just had to look pretty. (Not that the cinematography was anything special either.)
For all those three people debating this film, here be spoilers. Feel free to stop following the rant now.
Not only did they not try to make any kind of logical sense, they also did not find it necessary to follow the mythology laid down by the marvelous Richard Kelly (who, PS, really really did not back this film). Liquid spears become convienent blobs that don't really lead anywhere half the time, Living Recievers and Manipulated Dead are tossed in willy-nilly, and really, by the end of the movie, you can't figure out why anything happened to begin with.At least with Donnie Darko, you could get to the end and find a solid "Ohhh, I GET IT" moment waiting for you, tying everything together and at least sort of making sense of the purpose behind each of the events. S. Darko doesn't bother with this. It hurts to even try to figure out where the feather came from, or why it was pulled from a George Foreman commercial, or why the girl is so foolish that she places the life of her friend and a mermaid-scale dress on the same level.
When I got home, I looked up the IMDB page in the hopes that something would make sense. And it does try--more than the film does, anyway. But the thing I have to point out is, all of the "answers" to the questions left in the movie (If Donnie is dead, how on earth did Sam get ahold of the Philosophy of Time Travel? Why is there a sketch of Frank in the book if Frank never existed? How could they possibly justify Roberta Sparrow having a grandson, and why was his name in the old story about the unicorn--the one that Sam probably would never have written, since her happy-go-lucky self appeared to have died with her brother?) are either contrived like hell, or found in the depths of the DVD commentary.
A moment to ask the real question: who in God's name was so bored that they sat through the movie twice?
It irritates me to think that the makers of this movie didn't care enough to explain anything at all, and thought that the audience would be placated by buried mentions of various script drafts and "oh, by the way" comments on what actually happened on that screen. It irritates me even more to read that the writers believe this was "the fans' movie", made by and for the fans--when any fan of the movie would A) know to leave well enough alone and B) would never desecrate the original story arc/mythology quite so horribly. It just makes me sad.
(We won't even talk about how they're planning a third installment...the idea makes me want an Artifact to fall through my ceiling.)
For the record:
-Roberta Sparrow lived alone. She did not have a family. She had money, and she had her toaster-in-bathtub hair, and that was about all.
-Sam's hallucinations of unicorns in the clouds? Not cute.
-Sam's best friend inexplicably being a lying bitch and then paying for it by saving the life of the girl who was meant to die eventually anyway, only to be saved at the very beginning by the guy who made the mask that concussed her? ...What? Sorry, why did this movie take place? If Iraq Jack only moved because DeadFish!Sam told him to, and his moving caused DeadFish!Sam to exist in the first place, and DeadFish!SAm didn't WANT to exist (because, of course, in the first movie, Frank came to Donnie to rewrite the path that would destroy the lives of everyone around him, including Frank himself--an ultimately purposeful and selfless journey that, yes, had its loopholes because if Frank never came, then Donnie might have died and solved the whole problem, except Donnie was always sleepwalking anyway, so it was kind of a grab-bag to see if he'd stick around that night...time travel is effed up)...Okay, look, the whole concept of both Frank and DeadFish!Sam was kind of touch-and-go, but the difference is that DeadFish!Sam had nothing to do with regular Sam. It wasn't her sleepwalking. It would have done more good not to save Iraq Jack to begin with. BAH.
-A character named Iraq Jack--whose actual name is Justin Sparrow--who is the batty grandson of Roberta Sparrow--who, it is assumed, never left Middlesex in her whole damn reclusive life...no.
-The feather. And George Foreman. Fuck the what?
-Why was there an alien metal cube? What did it matter? WHAT THE HELL WAS ITS PURPOSE?
-Little boy. In cave. ...who is never saved. And beyond that, never really matters. The town cares more about stringing up Jack than anything else.
Long story short, godawful movie. The only good thing about it was the score, and it didn't even come close to that of DD. Truly appalling.